ThunderHome
| PlayerPlayer | GPGP | PTSPTS | REBREB | ASTAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 30.0 | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
| 3 | 18.3 | 4.0 | 3.0 | |
| 3 | 8.3 | 11.7 | 2.3 |
CavsAway
| PlayerPlayer | GPGP | PTSPTS | REBREB | ASTAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 17.7 | 8.3 | 2.0 | |
Evan Mobley(C) | 3 | 18.0 | 5.3 | 4.7 |
| 3 | 18.0 | 4.0 | 5.7 |
Cleveland, however, holds the recent shooting and rebounding edge: over its last five games it has shot 37.73% from three and averaged 48.8 rebounds.
| Time | Thunder | Cavs |
|---|---|---|
| 11.05 02:47 | 1.61 ▴ | 2.39 ▾ |
| 11.05 01:27 | 1.60 ▾ | 2.41 ▴ |
| 11.04 22:47 | 1.65 ▾ | 2.30 ▴ |
| PlayerPlayer | GPGP | PTSPTS | REBREB | ASTAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 30.0 | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
| 3 | 18.3 | 4.0 | 3.0 | |
| 3 | 8.3 | 11.7 | 2.3 |
| PlayerPlayer | GPGP | PTSPTS | REBREB | ASTAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 17.7 | 8.3 | 2.0 | |
Evan Mobley(C) | 3 | 18.0 | 5.3 | 4.7 |
| 3 | 18.0 | 4.0 | 5.7 |
Oklahoma City’s scoring route runs through Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s creation and Isaiah Hartenstein’s interior work and rebounding. Gilgeous-Alexander averaged 30 points and 4.33 assists over his last three player games; Hartenstein averaged 11.67 rebounds. Cleveland can contest the paint: Jarrett Allen and Evan Mobley each averaged one block over their last three player games. For the Cavs, Donovan Mitchell’s creation and Allen’s rebounding matter. Mitchell averaged 5.67 assists and Allen 17.67 points and 8.33 rebounds over their last three player games, but Thunder pressure could disrupt passing and interior finishes, so those figures are not guaranteed output.
The Thunder scored 108.8 and allowed 113.2 points per game over their last five, while their season averages—108 scored and 107.71 allowed—show steadier defense. Their recent 44.67% field-goal and 31.13% three-point shooting are slightly above season marks of 43.9% and 30.9%, but trail Cleveland’s recent 46.6% and 37.73%. Oklahoma City can answer with 50.4 paint points and 46.6 rebounds per game over its last five. Its season rebounding average is lower at 38.86, and Cleveland’s 36.4 defensive rebounds over its last five could limit inside scoring and second chances.
Cleveland averaged 121.4 points scored and 115.6 allowed over its last five, both above its season averages of 119.71 and 116.14. Its recent 37.73% three-point shooting also exceeds its 37.0% season mark, giving the offense a clear scoring route. Rebounding is another strength: 48.8 per game over the last five versus 41.29 for the season. But Oklahoma City’s 50.4 paint points per game over its last five will test the interior defense. Cleveland has protected possessions with 10.8 turnovers per game over that span. Still, it went 1-2 in its last three away games while allowing 113 points per game, so containing the Thunder inside is key to converting its road production into a win.
Across the five listed head-to-head games, Oklahoma City went 4-1, averaging 126 points scored and 114.4 allowed for an 11.6-point margin; combined scoring averaged 240.4. The most recent meeting was also a 117-112 Thunder win. The scoring pattern and Oklahoma City edge could recur, but that result alone cannot settle the current shooting and rebounding matchup. Cleveland’s higher three-point percentage and rebound total over its last five provide a credible way to challenge the prior pattern.
Was this analysis helpful?